Six Priests Nominated for December's Election of Two Bishops Suffragan in Los Angeles

Within the Episcopal Church, bishops suffragan are elected to assist the bishop of a diocese. The nominees, listed here with links to ministry and biographical information, are:

The Rev. Canon Diane M. Jardine Bruce, rector, St. Clement’s by-the-Sea Church in San Clemente, California;

The Rev. Canon Mary Douglas Glasspool, canon to the bishops in the Baltimore-based Diocese of Maryland;

The Rev. Zelda M. Kennedy, senior associate for pastoral care and spiritual growth, All Saints Church in Pasadena, California;

The Rev. John L. Kirkley, rector, St. John the Evangelist Church in San Francisco (Diocese of California);

The Rev. Silvestre E. Romero, rector, St Philip’s Church in San Jose, California (Diocese of El Camino Real); and

The Rev. Irineo Martir Vasquez, vicar, St. George’s Church in Hawthorne, California.

Read it all and follow through by looking at the biographical information.

Posted in Uncategorized

7 comments on “Six Priests Nominated for December's Election of Two Bishops Suffragan in Los Angeles

  1. Stefano says:

    The lack of Theology in the questions and the lack of Christ in the answers is staggering. And oh yeah, a few nominations that would pose a problem for the wider Anglican Communion. “…Damn the Moratoria! Full Speed Ahead!!!”

  2. The_Archer_of_the_Forest says:

    If one of them gets elected, I can already hear the spin doctors with a wink and a nod arguing, “The Moratorium is still in force, as it only applied to Diocesan bishops.”

  3. Words Matter says:

    No snark intended, but what does a diocese with ASA of about 20,000 need with three bishops? That’s smaller than any Catholic diocese I know of, and only the largest archdiocese have more than one or two bishops. It’s just a good sized evangelical mega-church; yes, they have large staffs, but so does LA when you include the priests, deacons, and lay staff persons. I suppose a fair number of Methodist Conferences are larger, and I never knew them to have multiple bishops. What do these people do with their time?

  4. Matthew A (formerly mousestalker) says:

    #3, a progressive is never idle. There is always plenty of other people’s business to poke noses into. H L Mencken’s definition of a puritan also applies to them as well.

  5. Billy says:

    Reading the resumes of these people, except for the obvious, at least Glasspool+ appears qualified. Kirkley+ certainly is not qualified and Kenndy+ appears unqualified as well. I didn’t have time to read the others.

  6. First Family Virginian says:

    Words Matter asks: No snark intended, but what does a diocese with ASA of about 20,000 need with three bishops?

    If you are going to take such an approach … then why not ask the same question about the number of bishops in the Church of the Southern Cone? It reports a membership (not even ASA) of 22,000 … and yet has far more than three bishops.

    Then there is the Anglican Church of North America reporting an ASA of 60,000+/- … approximately 3x that of the Diocese of Los Angeles. Why not ask why it needs more than 9 … or 3 x the number of bishops per 20,000 members attending on any given Sunday. ACNA has at least 30 bishops, if not more.

  7. Words Matter says:

    I did ask that question about the AMiA a few years ago. I’m not aware of what factors obtain in the Southern Cone. Of course, a missionary area can make good use of bishops, assuming they take the apostolic ministry of goig from place to place, starting churches. LA is hardly in a growth mode, and multiple bishops don’t seem to have done much to change that.

    There are times geography or culture matter; the Episcopal Diocese of Texas encompasses 3 geographical and cultural regions: Houston and the Gulf coast, Austin and the Hill Country, and the East Texas woods, centered around Tyler. Each city has a resident bishop (or did last I checked). That makes sense, although you wonder if they might not just as well make 3 dioceses.

    My point of reference was larger churches. Check out some Catholic dioceses:

    http://catholic-hierarchy.org/diocese/qview1.html

    Dallas has a million Catholics and one bishop
    Fort Worth has half a million and one bishop
    Houston, with a million, has an auxiliary, but the cardinal archbishop spends a certain amount of time in Rome, so he needs help.
    Interestingly, Tyler has 55,000 Catholics, with a bishop, but it doubled in size from 1990 to 2006.
    Corpus Christi, where 70% of the population is Catholic, has also experienced radical growth, but still has only one bishop.

    These are membership stats; overall ASA runs about 35%-40%, on a par with protestant churches. It may be lower in Texas due to the Mexican in-migration. I know that Fort Worth has an abysmal 20% ASA.

    So… I renew my question: what does a diocese like LA need with three bishops? How do they support mission?