The difficulty for an embedded American trainer is trying to take away a positive lesson about Afghan leadership. Waving your gun at your troops and then firing without warning is career suicide for an American military officer. But it works in Afghanistan. Bridging this cultural gap is something we just aren’t taught in our military schools.
Given the dearth of quality Afghan commanders, how do we make progress in cultivating a leadership cadre that can carry on the fight and win in our absence? My own solution to this problem was this: I simply ignored the incompetent officers. I didn’t waste time trying to change old men who had little interest in reform. Time was short, and lives were at stake, so I devoted my time developing the junior ranking officers and NCOs with good habits of effective leadership. I didn’t include the bad leaders in planning, and I didn’t expect them to go out on missions with our troops and me. Frankly, these senior officers preferred to be ignored, as it meant more nap time and vacation time for them, and less lecturing from a young pesky American Captain.
I focused on mentoring the young junior officers and NCOs who will be the future of the Afghan army. They will eventually assume command as their seniors retire, die or are forced out. Slowly but surely, these young studs will be percolating to the top of the chain of command.
If he really believes that and if that represents official US military policy, then we are in more trouble than we know. Afganistan is barely a country. It’s more a region (rugged) with a collection of tribes. Somewhat similar I suppose to American in the late 1500’s? Practices we call “corrupt” are the practices by which these folks have learned to survive. So they have to bend to our will? Rots of Luck with that strategy. How about killing the enemy? Whoops, the Russians tried that and it didn’t work so hot because someone (U.S.) kept resupplying them. Think that may be happening now?