Peter Moore–Did Jesus have to be born of a Virgin? Rethinking the Virgin Birth

…if we put aside the necessity of the Virgin Birth, can we not see the congruity of it? In other words, does the Virgin Birth not fit into a kind of biblical logic once you accept the Bible’s overall Trinitarian framework?

Since God was in the business of re-starting creation in the sending of his Son, might we not expect him to create “out of nothing” the second time, just as he did the first? Karl Barth, the greatest theologian of the 20th Century, thought so. Just as the Spirit brooded over creation the first time, so again in the birth of Jesus the Spirit “brooded” over the virgin Mary. Also, just as creation was totally initiated by God the first time, so creation (the second time, in Jesus) gets to be totally initiated by God. The Virgin Birth tells us that Jesus was not born “of the will of man”, but wholly of the Father’s initiative. God chose to by-pass the normal male role in the work of redemption, in part, so the logic goes, to signal his own headship. “Man as a creating, controlling, self-assertive, self-glorifying being was set aside in favor of a woman who listened, received, and served.” (From, A Step Further, by the author)

We honor the Virgin Birth, of course, because Scripture teaches it. But we can also see the logic behind it. God’s sovereign action is a challenge to the human psychological need to contribute to our own salvation, to be co-creators with God. Mary is a witness against the drive, push, and self-assertion that men especially (though not exclusively) associate with a healthy self-image and by which men often mask their own impotence.

Read it all.

Posted in * Christian Life / Church Life, Advent, Ascension, Christology, Church Year / Liturgical Seasons, Soteriology, Theology

2 comments on “Peter Moore–Did Jesus have to be born of a Virgin? Rethinking the Virgin Birth

  1. Capt. Father Warren says:

    [i]The Virgin Birth may not be necessary to sound theology; but it is entirely consistent with it[/i]

    Interesting article but the title seems a bit misleading. Perhaps “re-examining the Virgin Birth” would have been better. And since Theology is Faith seeking Understanding, why isn’t the Virgin Birth necessary to a sound theology? A final sentence which does not fit the rest of the article………then again, maybe it does.

  2. TomRightmyer says:

    Confessing faith in the mystery of the Virgin Birth of Jesus is one of the signs of credal orthodoxy and trust in the authority of Scripture. Confessed disbelief in the Virgin Birth is a sure sign of unorthodox theology.