A Review of 'Archbishop Justin Welby ”“ The Road to Canterbury ”“ an unauthorised biography'

By Canon Chris Sugden
Welby himself reflected on lessons from treasury management for conflict resolution: synthesise a lot of information quickly and under pressure; flexibility in attitude, analytical models, planning and execution; and steely determination towards key goals.

His reconciliation ministry developed six “Rs” for work in conflict situations: Researching ”“ carefully listening to all sides and also identifying ”˜spoilers’ with a vested interest in continuation of the conflict and planning to deal with them; Relating ”“ to people not to an office and not because they are good but because they are there; Relieving ”“ alleviating the socio-economic roots of conflict; Risking ”“ and trusting the sovereignty of God; Reconciling ”“ to enable warring communities to continue to disagree without violence or mutual destruction, a process that cannot be contained simply within the Church; and Resourcing ”“ enabling communities to address their own conflicts without outside assistance. Christ’s shed blood was ”˜the fountain of reconciliation with God , from which all other reconciliation flows’.

From his study of Thiselton’s commentary on 1 Corinthians Welby noticed that although the Corinthians were in error on several major theological issues, the Apostle Paul continued to treat them “as fellow members of the family of God”.

In moving to Liverpool as Dean and then Durham as bishop he focused on risk-taking in decisive leadership interwoven with collegiality and consensus.

Read it all

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, --Justin Welby, Archbishop of Canterbury

2 comments on “A Review of 'Archbishop Justin Welby ”“ The Road to Canterbury ”“ an unauthorised biography'

  1. MichaelA says:

    Interesting article, but it essentially deals with what ++Welby has done in the past. What he does in future is the key issue.

  2. driver8 says:

    From his study of Thiselton’s commentary on 1 Corinthians Welby noticed that although the Corinthians were in error on several major theological issues, the Apostle Paul continued to treat them “as fellow members of the family of God”.

    I think this is right. But treating them as “fellow members” meant giving them fairly direct instruction and warning. Reconciliation for St. Paul has a denser content than, “to enable warring communities to continue to disagree without violence or mutual destruction”.