[PG] Moore would not have published Archbishop paternity story without his consent

Press Gazette: ‘Former Telegraph editor Moore would not have published Archbishop paternity story without his consent’
..Moore said he would not have pursued the story past the research stage without cooperation from Archbishop Welby.

“I think it is a good story to do but only with certain qualifications,” he said. “I thought to myself it would be wrong to front him up with the story and say I will do it whatever happens.”

He added: “In a sense he had power over the story because he could have behaved differently, he could have said go away and I think if he had done that I would not have been able to go further.”
………….
Moore said: “He is a very direct man, decisive, and said let’s have a DNA test because certainty is better than doubt. I said I will organise that and I was a bit surprised actually that he wanted to do that. I thought he might want to have a private chat with his mother in the first instance.”

But the Archbishop believed it was better to find out if the story was true first.

The Archbishop took the DNA test in front of Moore. “The result was undeniable and he immediately accepted it and spoke to his mother,” he said.

Moore understood it was unlikely 86-year-old Lady Williams of Elvel would want to give an interview, but she confirmed the story to her son and released a statement on Friday night.

Read it all

print

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, --Justin Welby, Archbishop of Canterbury

One comment on “[PG] Moore would not have published Archbishop paternity story without his consent

  1. dwstroudmd+ says:

    “He is a very direct man, decisive, and said let’s have a DNA test because certainty is better than doubt.”

    Except in matters of Primates and the Anglican Communion, eh?