A (Times) Editorial–Lambeth Conference: good news for Williams

Whether by design or by accident, the Archbishop was helped by the absence of the traditionalists who decided before their earlier meeting in Jerusalem to boycott Lambeth. By doing so, they avoided confrontation, but also removed the elements of grievance and contention. Indeed, the sharp criticism of Dr Williams’s leadership and the provocative claim that his office was a “remnant of British colonialism”, voiced in The Times by the Archbishop of Uganda, were blunted by coming from outside the mainstream.

The other inspired innovation was to avoid contentious votes and adopt instead the African indaba, a way of resolving conflicts in small groups around a metaphorical campfire. The cameradie, however, should not mask the fact that divisions remain, and not only within the Church. On issues such as gender and sexuality, the Anglican Church remains, in this country, still at odds with the generally accepted social climate. Dr Williams should not allow the Lambeth truce to impede those seeking a more liberal and open approach. Time may change attitudes, but he needs still to point the way.

The outcome has, admittedly, been a setback to convergence with Roman Catholicism. But this was always less urgent than preventing acrimonious splits within Anglicanism. By concentrating on the spiritual, his forte, Dr Williams – albeit a wilier politician than realised – has lifted the sights of a Church in trouble. He may even have led it into calmer times: no small achievement for a much maligned primate.

Read it all.

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, Anglican Provinces, Archbishop of Canterbury, Church of England (CoE), Lambeth 2008

5 comments on “A (Times) Editorial–Lambeth Conference: good news for Williams

  1. Chris Taylor says:

    Yes, avoiding contentious issues and ignoring the fundamental tear in the fabric of the Communion is sure to go down as the great accomplishment of this Lambeth Conference and will be the lasting legacy of this ABC. Whether that will be “good news” for the historic Communion, however, is doubtful.

  2. austin says:

    If one goes by numbers, those not attending were “the mainstream.” English journalists have not yet got their heads around the new reality.

  3. Baruch says:

    Now he can quickly retire and give the next appointee the dirty end of the stick,

  4. Father Will Brown says:

    “Good news for Williams”????

    If the crack up of the communion is “good news”, then yes. Good news indeed.