Jim Oakes: The True Cost of Episcopal Property Battles

This week, a judge in Fairfax County, Va., will hear the last round of arguments in a church property case that has drawn national attention. As a member of Truro Church, one of the parishes being sued by The Episcopal Church and Diocese of Virginia, I’d like to reflect on how we got to this point and what we could be doing with the money that has been spent on legal fees.

This journey started two years ago, when ten congregations, formerly part of the Diocese, voted to sever our ties with The Episcopal Church and affiliate with the Convocation of Anglicans in North America, a new denomination affiliated with the Anglican Church of Nigeria, thereby remaining with the worldwide Anglican Communion. These congregations are now part of the Anglican District of Virginia, which has grown to include 23 Virginia congregations in its short history.

We made that decision soberly and prayerfully, based on actions of The Episcopal Church to walk away from what we see as the basic tenets of the Christian faith. Our decision was not about issues of lifestyle or minor differences of opinion. We simply could not continue to be led by a church body that would not affirm the authority of Scripture.

Read it all.

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, Episcopal Church (TEC), TEC Conflicts, TEC Conflicts: Virginia

2 comments on “Jim Oakes: The True Cost of Episcopal Property Battles

  1. Undergroundpewster says:

    He concludes,

    “Do congregations have a say in what happens to property that they and their ancestors have bought, paid for, and maintained over the years? What recourse do members of a local church have when their national church works against the Biblical beliefs that are foundational to their faith? Reasonable people can differ about those answers, and we understand that. Secular courts, however, are the last place that Christians should want to resolve them.”

    I agree wholeheartedly with the last sentence.

  2. Pb says:

    I do not think the ancestors of current congregations would have given money to a church that reflected the views of TEC. This is a complete fiction. They supported a church which reflected their values which did not include the offlice of presiding bishop or the institution of general convention.