Citigroup pays for a rush to risk

From 2003 to 2005, Citigroup more than tripled its issuing of CDO’s, to more than $20 billion from $6.28 billion, and Maheras, Barker and others on the CDO team helped transform Citigroup into one of the industry’s biggest players. Firms issuing the CDO’s generated fees of 0.4 percent to 2.5 percent of the amount sold — meaning Citigroup made up to $500 million in fees from the business in 2005 alone.

Even as Citigroup’s CDO stake was expanding, its top executives wanted more profits from that business. Yet they were not running a bank that was up to all the challenges it faced, including properly overseeing billions of dollars’ worth of exotic products, according to Citigroup insiders and regulators who later criticized the bank.

When Prince was put in charge in 2003, he presided over a mess of warring business units and operational holes, particularly in critical areas like risk-management and controls.

“He inherited a gobbledygook of companies that were never integrated, and it was never a priority of the company to invest,” said Meredith Whitney, a banking analyst who was one of the company’s early critics. “The businesses didn’t communicate with each other. There were dozens of technology systems and dozens of financial ledgers.”

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Economics, Politics, Credit Markets, Economy, Housing/Real Estate Market, Stock Market, The Credit Freeze Crisis of Fall 2008/The Recession of 2007--

One comment on “Citigroup pays for a rush to risk

  1. Ad Orientem says:

    A small correction to the title of this article…

    “Taxpayers pay for Citigroup’s rush to risk”

    Under the mercy,
    [url=http://ad-orientem.blogspot.com/]John[/url]

    An [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gj4pUphDitA]Orthodox [/url] Christian