The pressure on time as a result of the extended debate on Living in Love and Faith provisions was never going to allow this group of sessions to complete the scheduled debate on simplifying the governance of the national church institutions (NCIs). An interim report presented to the General Synod for debate contained 22 recommendations in relation to creating a single governance body: Church of England National Services (CENS).

Prudence Dailey (Oxford) tried to intervene at the outset to adjourn the debate, but procedure meant that the motion — to welcome the report and encourage the National Church Governance Project Board (NCGPB) to continue developing a legislative framework — had first to be moved by the Bishop of Guildford, the Rt Revd Andrew Watson.

He was keen to do this, he said, given how many staff had been working on it. Many people would be affected by the changes, he said, referring to a “them-and-us” trust deficit in the Church at many levels, compounded by a national governance structure that meant that people were unclear how decisions were made. The “convoluted structures” were liable to be bypassed to get something done, he suggested.

The positive aim of CENS was clarity, Bishop Watson said. There would be a full overview at the July sessions.

Miss Dailey tried again for adjournment on a “matter of exceptional significance and importance” that, through no one’s fault, had been “shoved in at the tag end of Synod”. It needed proper scrutiny, she said.

Bishop Watson urged members to resist adjournment at this stage, which they did.

Read it all.

General Synod digest: Governance plan sidelined by same-sex debate https://t.co/JCK55RGOci

— Church Times (@ChurchTimes) February 17, 2023

What emerges as an ecclesiological structure, we may be sure, will be neither British nor Western. What emerges, we may be just as sure, will represent the conciliarism that has characterized Anglicanism at its best. Ironically, the Lambeth Conferences from 1867 to 1998 represented that conciliar ecclesiology in significant measure. Similarly, the
instinct that put the resolution of the North American crisis of 2002/2003 into the hands of the Primates Meeting was in the right direction, the direction of the global Anglican
future. Just as at Lambeth 1998 where the reality of a global Communion was unmistakable – with its non-Western hegemony and its uncompromised biblical and missionary commitments – the Primates Meeting actually represented where the Anglican Communion in its historic evolution necessarily had to move.

A huge part of what brings us here to GAFCON is that the process of resolution of the present crisis – a process begun at the Primates Meeting of 2003 (Lambeth) and continued through the Primates Meeting of 2007 (Dar es Salaam) – was suddenly aborted. The conciliar instinct that produced repeated global consensus about how the crisis was to be addressed, that expressed the global will of the Communion in dealing with the North American problem, was abruptly terminated. In this termination the role of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the role of the interests of the Western and progressive Provinces were central.

Archbishop Williams remarked at the beginning of the Dar es Salaam Primates Meeting: “It is all a question of who blinks first.” Neither the American orthodox, nor the Global
South Primates, nor history would blink. Not then, not now. The so-called “blink” has taken place, but it has taken place in the re-definition of the Lambeth Conference as a
place of managed conversation, not conciliar decision, and in the recognition that to call the Primates Meeting together ever again would be to confirm that the Communion’s
engine has shifted to the South. Re-defining the Lambeth Conference and not calling the Primates Meeting are exercises of colonial control. But the inexorable shift of power
from Britain and the West to the Global South cannot be stopped, and some conciliar instrument reflective of the shift is bound to emerge as the Reformation Settlement gives
way to a Global (post-colonial) Settlement.

13 years ago I was ordained a Priest (Presbyter) in the Church by Archbishop Bob Duncan. Grateful for the work that God has given me to do and the work he continues doing in me! pic.twitter.com/O75SmugklL

— Daniel Adkinson (@DanielAdkinson) September 12, 2022

At 82 years old, with an aggressive form of blood cancer that six courses of chemotherapy had failed to eliminate, “Paul” appeared to be out of options. With each long and unpleasant round of treatment, his doctors had been working their way down a list of common cancer drugs, hoping to hit on something that would prove effective—and crossing them off one by one. The usual cancer killers were not doing their job.

With nothing to lose, Paul’s doctors enrolled him in a trial set up by the Medical University of Vienna in Austria, where he lives. The university was testing a new matchmaking technology developed by a UK-based company called Exscientia that pairs individual patients with the precise drugs they need, taking into account the subtle biological differences between people.

The researchers took a small sample of tissue from Paul (his real name is not known because his identity was obscured in the trial). They divided the sample, which included both normal cells and cancer cells, into more than a hundred pieces and exposed them to various cocktails of drugs. Then, using robotic automation and computer vision (machine-learning models trained to identify small changes in cells), they watched to see what would happen.

In effect, the researchers were doing what the doctors had done: trying different drugs to see what worked. But instead of putting a patient through multiple months-long courses of chemotherapy, they were testing dozens of treatments all at the same time.

The approach allowed the team to carry out an exhaustive search for the right drug. Some of the medicines didn’t kill Paul’s cancer cells. Others harmed his healthy cells. Paul was too frail to take the drug that came out on top. So he was given the runner-up in the matchmaking process: a cancer drug marketed by the pharma giant Johnson & Johnson that Paul’s doctors had not tried because previous trials had suggested it was not effective at treating his type of cancer.

It worked. Two years on, Paul was in complete remission—his cancer was gone.

Read it all.

On average, it takes more than 10 years and billions of dollars to develop a new drug.

Incorporating AI into the drug development pipeline could help create cheaper pharmaceuticals faster. https://t.co/xYVZFyA5fY

— MIT Technology Review (@techreview) February 15, 2023

From there:

Emergency GSFA Primates Meeting following CofE General Synod decision (Feb 2023)

The GSFA Primates met virtually on the 12th of February 2023 to reflect on the Church of England’s recent decision to bless couples in same sex union and make the appropriate response towards this innovation. After discussing the matter, the Primates agreed that the Church of England has departed from the historic faith of the Church.

The GSFA will issue a statement on Monday 20th February of what was decided at said meeting.

Major statement: Global South to "reset" Anglican Communion after Synod vote
"In view of these developments, the GSFA will be taking decisive steps towards re-setting the Anglican Communion" https://t.co/vakl54Npa9

— Evangelicals Now: online & in print (@EvangelicalsNow) February 9, 2023

In Uganda, during the eight years in the 1970’s when Idi Amin and his men slaughtered probably half a million Ugandans, “We live today and are gone tomorrow” was the common phrase.

We learned that living in danger, when the Lord Jesus is the focus of your life, can be liberating. For one thing, you are no longer imprisoned by your own security, because there is none. So the important security that people sought was to be anchored in God.

As we testified to the safe place we had in Jesus, many people who had been pagan, or were on the fringes of Christianity, flocked to the church or to individuals, asking earnestly, “How do you prepare yourself for death?” Churches all over the country were packed both with members and seekers. This was no comfort to President Amin, who was making wild promises to Libya and other Arab nations that Uganda would soon be a Muslim country. (It is actually 80 per cent Christian)….
It became clear to us through the Scriptures that our resistance was to be that of overcoming evil with good. This included refusing to cooperate with anything that dehumanizes people, but we reaffirmed that we can never be involved in using force or weapons.

…we knew, of course, that the accusation against our beloved brother, Archbishop Janani Luwum, that he was hiding weapons for an armed rebellion, was untrue, a frame-up to justify his murder.

The archbishop’s arrest, and the news of his death, was a blow from the Enemy calculated to send us reeling. That was on February 16, 1977. The truth of the matter is that it boomeranged on Idi Amin himself. Through it he lost respect in the world and, as we see it now, it was the beginning of the end for him.

For us, the effect can best be expressed in the words of the little lady who came to arrange flowers, as she walked through the cathedral with several despondent bishops who were preparing for Archbishop Luwum’s Memorial Service. She said, “This is going to put us twenty times forward, isn’t it?” And as a matter of fact, it did.

More than four thousand people walked, unintimidated, past Idi Amin’s guards to pack St. Paul’s Cathedral in Kampala on February 20. They repeatedly sang the “Martyr’s Song,” which had been sung by the young Ugandan martyrs in 1885. Those young lads had only recently come to know the Lord, but they loved Him so much that they could refuse the evil thing demanded of them by King Mwanga. They died in the flames singing, “Oh that I had wings such as angels have, I would fly away and be with the Lord.” They were given wings, and the singing of those thousands at the Memorial Service had wings too.

–Festo Kivengere, Revolutionary Love, Chapter Nine

🔵 #TodayInHistory #February16 #Uganda 🇺🇬

➡️1977 – Arrested Archbishop Janani Luwum last seen in public. Killed on orders of Pres. Idi Amin.

➡️ Also killed is Charles Oboth‐Ofumbi, Minister Internal Affairs & Lt Col Erinayo Oryema, Minister Land & Water Res. #JananiLuwum pic.twitter.com/m0wp18b6To

— Louis Jadwong (@Jadwong) February 16, 2023

O God, whose Son the Good Shepherd laid down his life for the sheep: We give thee thanks for thy faithful shepherd, Janani Luwum, who after his Savior’s example gave up his life for the people of Uganda. Grant us to be so inspired by his witness that we make no peace with oppression, but live as those who are sealed with the cross of Christ, who died and rose again, and now liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.

Today the Church of England celebrates Janani Luwum, Archbishop of Uganda, Martyr, 1977 https://t.co/vem2rF2KJf

Image: Detail of window in St John's Anglican Cathedral, Winnipeg, via https://t.co/o5f92VHUhA pic.twitter.com/1TiuYSyhGc

— The Anglican Church in St Petersburg (@anglicanspb) February 17, 2023

O Christ our God, who wilt come to judge the world in the manhood which thou hast assumed: We pray thee to sanctify us wholly, that in the day of thy coming we may be raised to live and reign with thee for ever.

South Glensheil Ridge #Scotland @angie_weather @bbcweather @VisitScotland @StormHour @ThePhotoHour pic.twitter.com/06AMnl3Piy

— James MacInnes (@Macinnesplant) February 17, 2023

Of old thou didst lay the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of thy hands. They will perish, but thou dost endure; they will all wear out like a garment. Thou changest them like raiment, and they pass away; but thou art the same, and thy years have no end.

–Psalm 102:25-27

Everything is better at the beach. Even overcast morning. Nauset Harbor this morning. #capecod pic.twitter.com/uxuRO3gQON

— Darius Aniunas (@dariusaniunas) February 17, 2023