[blockquote] Question 1: Is the Province able to give an ‘in principle’ commitment to the Covenant process (without committing itself to the details of any text)?
“Following debate the motion was amended to ‘That this Synod affirm an “in principle” commitment to participate actively in discussions regarding the future shape of the Anglican Communion at this time (without necessarily committing itself to the concept of a Covenant)’ This motion was passed by a significant majority.”[/blockquote]
Ah, see the evangelical efforts of the ECUSA/TEC/GCC/EO-PAC have paid off. We have genuine episcospeak in question 1. Where there’s episcospeak, episcounilateralaction is sure to follow.
From the Ministry of Silly Answers,
[blockquote] Question 1: Is the Province able to give an ‘in principle’ commitment to the Covenant process (without committing itself to the details of any text)?
“Following debate the motion was amended to ‘That this Synod affirm an “in principle” commitment to participate actively in discussions regarding the future shape of the Anglican Communion at this time (without necessarily committing itself to the concept of a Covenant)’ This motion was passed by a significant majority.”[/blockquote]
Ah, see the evangelical efforts of the ECUSA/TEC/GCC/EO-PAC have paid off. We have genuine episcospeak in question 1. Where there’s episcospeak, episcounilateralaction is sure to follow.