A.S. Haley–Court Rebuffs Claims Against San Joaquin's Attorneys

It seems that whenever a court ruling comes out in ECUSA’s favor, or that could put the orthodox into an unfavorable light, all of the Episcopal/Anglican blogs on the left have news about the ruling up on their sites within a day, if not within hours. Just as a little experiment, I have delayed putting up this post about a recent court ruling in the San Joaquin litigation that went mostly against ECUSA, Bishop Lamb, and the group he leads in order to see whether any of those same blogs would discuss it. Well, there has been not a word, even on the group’s official Website—and not even about the part of the ruling that was in their favor, either (see below for details: this blog may be ponderous to some, but we do cover both the favorable and the unfavorable).

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, * Culture-Watch, Episcopal Church (TEC), Law & Legal Issues, TEC Conflicts, TEC Conflicts: San Joaquin

3 comments on “A.S. Haley–Court Rebuffs Claims Against San Joaquin's Attorneys

  1. Intercessor says:

    Wild,Tipton,and Carter is an established successful law firm in Fresno.
    For nearly 120 years this firm has been instrumental in shaping the lives and the growth of the San Joaquin valley.
    The charges are just more noise from a self appointed emperor who has no clothes. The Judge is reconsidering his knee jerk reaction on the Summary judgment and will do a better job very soon.
    Intercessor
    http://www.wctlaw.com/firmhistory.html

  2. Cennydd says:

    One can hope, can’t one?

  3. Doug Martin says:

    I do congratulate Titus One Nine for publishing diverse points of view and balance in its copy if not its commentary thereon. Because of that it is the only conservative blog I can stand to read regularly. On the other hand, if it printed only the conservative side, there would be nothing to be critical of.

    [i]Slightly edited by elf. [/i]