Sunday (London) Times Leader: Barack Obama's banking plan could split the West

Scott Brown has a lot to answer for. His stunning Senate victory for the Republicans in Massachusetts sent the White House into a spin. President Obama promptly decided on the populist gesture of targeting Wall Street with vague proposals to outlaw banks’ risky activities and limit their size. Though seemingly hastily wheeled out, the ideas were first floated a few months ago by Paul Volcker, former chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, a man widely regarded as the best US central banker of the modern era. As a result they have some credibility, though they are far from being a panacea.

Many believe the banks have brought this on their own heads. The return of big bonuses so soon after a crisis of their own making, for which ordinary people will be paying for years, showed crass insensitivity and greed. America’s banks rushed to pay off their obligations to taxpayers under the Tarp (troubled asset relief programme) precisely so that they could get back on the bonus gravy train. The behaviour of the banks, however, is no excuse for flawed policy. Nobody yet knows the detail of Mr Obama’s plans, probably not even the president. But from what we know so far, they suffer from two serious shortcomings.

The first is that they would not have stopped the current crisis….

Read the whole thing.

Posted in * Culture-Watch, * Economics, Politics, * International News & Commentary, Corporations/Corporate Life, Economy, England / UK, Federal Reserve, Globalization, House of Representatives, Law & Legal Issues, Office of the President, Politics in General, President Barack Obama, Senate, Stock Market, The 2009 Obama Administration Bank Bailout Plan, The Banking System/Sector, The Credit Freeze Crisis of Fall 2008/The Recession of 2007--, The September 2008 Proposed Henry Paulson 700 Billion Bailout Package, The U.S. Government, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

One comment on “Sunday (London) Times Leader: Barack Obama's banking plan could split the West

  1. Vatican Watcher says:

    I’m not going to read all that. The article showed itself to be irrelevant with this paragraph:

    [blockquote]Many believe the banks have brought this on their own heads. The return of big bonuses so soon after a crisis of their own making, [i]{Congress’ own making with its instruction to banks to lend lend lend to lower income families}[/i] for which ordinary people will be paying for years, showed crass insensitivity and greed [i](purely subjective)[/i]. America’s banks rushed to pay off their obligations to taxpayers under the Tarp (troubled asset relief programme) precisely so that they could get back on the bonus gravy train [i](or maybe because they were forced into TARP by strong-arm tactics by the government and wanted to get out from under all the heavy obligations of partial government ownership as fast as possible)[/i].[/blockquote]