(SMH) Paul McGeough: Obama faces insurmountable battle in Afghanistan

After almost a decade, the fix is in and the news is bad. Just as Afghanistan’s Hamid Karzai has Barack Obama precisely where he wants him, so too Pakistan has the US leader where it would like to keep him – up against a wall, writing big fat cheques.

There have always been three essential elements to this conflict in Afghanistan. The first two essentials are whatever might be achieved militarily and what could be achieved in governance to sustain any military gains. But just as important is the extent to which neighbouring Pakistan will come to the party, to facilitate these two. And in the absence of gains either in governance or with Pakistan, any counter-insurgency effort almost certainly will fail.

Accounts of the mechanics of the Obama White House’s review of progress in the war – announced last week – suggest that the military swayed the debate with evidence of some tactical success in the south of the country. Perhaps. But the President would do well to pay more attention to the reports of the intelligence services, which go a good way to explaining the impossible task ahead.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Economics, Politics, * International News & Commentary, America/U.S.A., Asia, Defense, National Security, Military, Foreign Relations, Pakistan, Politics in General, War in Afghanistan

One comment on “(SMH) Paul McGeough: Obama faces insurmountable battle in Afghanistan

  1. IsraelTravel says:

    It’s a horrible culture who oppress the women. How backwards is the faith to treat women worst then dogs.

    Regards,
    Experience [url=http://www.israeltourismconsultants.com/]Christian Tours of Israel[/url] You’ll never be the same!