Dear Brothers and Sisters in Christ,
As most of you are well aware, the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church met September 19th -25th in New Orleans. Immediately following was a meeting of The Common Cause Partnership, held in Pittsburgh, September 25th – 28th. I attended both meetings, the second of which as an observer. Rather than come out with some statement immediately upon my return, I felt it necessary to take a few days to pray and reflect on all that occurred, as well as deal with all the diocesan business that was awaiting me upon my return. I would now like to share some of my thoughts and observations. I greatly appreciate your patience.
Regarding the House of Bishops’ Meeting, there were some hopeful things that occurred, as well as some frustrating and disappointing things, all of which I will speak more about in the following response. The main task confronting the bishops going into the meeting was how to respond to the February 2007 Dar es Salaam Communiqué from the Primates of the Anglican Communion.
Essentially we were asked to make a clear response to four areas of concern:
1) Will the House of Bishops make an unequivocal common covenant that the bishops will
not authorize any Rite of Blessing for same-sex unions in their dioceses or through
General Convention?
2) Will the House of Bishops confirm that the passing of Resolution BO33 of the 75th
General Convention means that a candidate for Episcopal orders living in a same sex union
shall not receive the necessary consent; unless some new consensus on these matters
emerges across the Communion?
3) Will the House of Bishops allow participation in the pastoral scheme proposed in the Dar
es Salaam Communiqué which would provide an alternative Primatial Vicar for those
dioceses requesting it?
4) Will the House of Bishops respond favorably to the urging from the Primates for representatives of The Episcopal Church and of those congregations in property disputes to suspend all legal actions against one another?
The statement made by the House of Bishops in response to the four areas of concern just mentioned can be found on the Diocesan Website: http://www.albanyepiscopaldiocese.org/news/other/071002.html. As you might expect, there has been a great deal of debate and speculation these past several days regarding the bishops’ response and how it will be received by the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Primates of the Anglican Communion.
While some believe that the Bishops’ Statement adequately addresses the Primates’ concerns and will thereby be favorably received, helping to mend the “tear in the fabric” of our common life in Christ, others argue that it is more of the same, falling far short of the clear unequivocal response requested by the Primates. Unfortunately, the recently released Joint Standing Committee (JSC) Report on the House of Bishops’ response only adds to the confusion.
On the one hand the JSC report states, “We believe that the Episcopal Church has clarified all outstanding questions relating to their response to the questions directed explicitly to them, and on which clarifications were sought by the 30th of September and given the necessary assurance sought of them.” However, as stated by Archbishop Mouneer Aris, Primate of Jerusalem and the
Middle East, “It is very unfortunate that not all the members of the JSC were present when a response to the House of Bishops of TEC was drafted. The lack of discussion and interaction will not produce a report that expresses the view of the whole committee.” He went on to say, “the House of Bishops has not responded positively to either the Windsor Report or the Dar es Salam Primates’ recommendations.”
Ultimately, Archbishop Rowan Williams and the other Primates will decide for themselves as to the adequacy of the Bishops’ Statement. A copy of the JSC report has been sent to all the Anglican Communion Primates and members of the Anglican Consultive Council with the request that they respond back to the Archbishop of Canterbury by the end of October.
Given the seriousness of the situation we find ourselves in, with the very future of the Anglican Communion, The Episcopal Church and ultimately the Diocese of Albany at stake, I urge each of us to keep the Archbishop of Canterbury along with the other Primates and members of the ACC in our prayers as they attempt to discern God’s will in how best to move forward. This truly is a critical time in the life of the Church. As we have all been reminded, the very fabric of the Anglican Communion has been torn. The decisions that will be made in the coming weeks and months could very well determine whether the fabric can be mended or whether it will be completely ripped in half, leading to the breakup of the Anglican Communion. I believe such a development would be tragic, delivering a major blow to all of Christendom.
In John’s Gospel, we read Jesus’ prayer for unity, “Holy Father, protect them in your name that you have given me, so that they may be one, as we are one”¦I have given them your word, and the world has hated them because they do not belong to the world”¦I ask you to protect them from the evil one”¦Sanctify them in the truth; your word is truth”¦I ask not only on behalf of these, but also on behalf of those who will believe in me through their word, that they may all be one. As you, Father, are in me and I am in you, may they also be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me.” (John 17:11, 14, 17, 20-21, 23) May our Lord ’s prayer for unity be our prayer. We are not just talking about the future relationship of The Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion. The spread of the Gospel and the salvation of countless souls are at stake. The current environment within the Episcopal Church, with all the attacks and infighting is not very conducive to bringing people into a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.
It is time to call a truce in the current battle, to give us time to rethink the road I am afraid the Episcopal Church and Anglican Communion may very well go down if we are not careful. There is enough guilt, blame, pain and hurt to cover all sides. It is easy to point fingers at one another, blaming the other for the mess that we are in, but the reality is, we are all guilty. We have all contributed to the broken state of affairs in the Church ”“ conservative, liberal, orthodox, revisionist — whatever classification or label we might have. We are all in need of asking for forgiveness and offering forgiveness. Part of the House of Bishops inability to work more closely with one another and with the wider Anglican Communion is a result of past hurts and offenses that have never healed, been forgiven, or honestly dealt with. With that said, however, there are hopeful signs with the current governance of the House of Bishops that some healing can start taking place.
Genuine theological differences are another major contributing factor to the House’s inability to offer a more clear response to the Primates’ request. While the final statement made by the House of Bishops was much better than it started out, it fell far short of what I and several other Windsor Bishops had hoped for. It does however show the division within the House over the issues we are struggling with. Much of the apparent ambiguity in the response was actually an indication that the House is not all of one mind, but in fact is divided, despite various statements to suggest otherwise.
In the March 2007 Statement from the House of Bishops, the following remark was made: “In truth, the number of those who seek to divide our Church is small”¦The fact that we have among ourselves, and indeed encourage, a diversity of opinion on issues of sexuality should in no way be misunderstood to mean that we are divided, except among a very few, in our love for The Episcopal Church”¦”
During the House of Bishops Meeting, I along with other conservative bishops challenged the above statement. At the very least I believe this statement is inaccurate and fails to acknowledge the pain, frustration, embarrassment and anger that thousands of theologically conservative and orthodox Episcopalians are experiencing throughout the Episcopal Church. I’m not sure what is more frustrating, the fact that the statement was ever made, or that some actually believe it in light of the growing exodus of some of our largest parishes to include Christ Church, Plano (the largest Episcopal Church in the nation); Falls Church, VA; Truro Church, VA; the Pro Cathedral of St. Clement, El Paso; as well as numerous other smaller churches around the country, not to mention the tens of thousands of individual Episcopalians who have left the Episcopal Church in the last few years to go elsewhere because they cannot support the current direction of the National Church and because they are tired of fighting. In discussing the March statement, I pointed out that not only did I believe it was inaccurate for the reasons just mentioned, but to suggest that the number of people upset about the current state of affairs in the Church is “small” or “a very few” is insulting, insinuating that their views are insignificant. I stated, “I don’t consider myself or others who share similar theological views to be insignificant.” Fortunately, attempts to put similar statements in the September HOB response were not approved.
In the various attempts these past several years, as well intentioned as some of them may have been, to correct past injustices and make The Episcopal Church more inclusive, reaching out to the marginalized in society (particularly within the homosexual community), the Church has unfortunately become more exclusive, creating a new class of victims ”“ the traditional orthodox believers. Clergy and laity alike, who acknowledge the authority of Holy Scripture, recognizing it as the revealed Word of God, and who believe the faith proclaimed in the Apostles and Nicene Creeds, as well as the traditional moral teachings of the Church, now find themselves under attack not only from the world as Jesus warned they would, but even more disturbingly, from within the Church itself. I believe the growing exodus of thousands and thousands of Episcopalians out of the Episcopal Church to CANA, AMiA, and the various other Anglican bodies that are springing up bear witness to the truth of this statement. The average Sunday attendance in The Episcopal Church across the United States is now under 800,000.
If we are to stop the current downward spiral of The Episcopal Church and the unraveling of the Anglican Communion, it is essential that the leadership of the Episcopal Church (Lay and Ordained) as well as the leadership of the wider Anglican Communion acknowledge the reality of the crisis we are in and then commit ourselves to work together to identify and honestly address the issues that have brought us to this point. While some are working toward this goal, much more still needs to be done. One thing is certain, if there is to be a turn around in the Church, there must be a viable place for the conservative orthodox voice. I was pleased at the September meeting that more conservative orthodox bishops began speaking up. I was also encouraged by the greater sense of cooperation between bishops of highly differing views. The warm reception that I, as a conservative bishop, have personally received by the vast majority of the bishops has been greatly appreciated and ads to my sense of hope for the future.
Some of the major problems we find ourselves confronted with include how to work through the very real theological differences in understanding of Holy Scripture and its authority in our lives; how to live out one’s human sexuality in a manner that is pleasing to God; how to best minister to those who find themselves to be homosexual; and what it means to live in communion with one another, exercising appropriate discipline when necessary while at the same time not falling into Satan’s trap of dividing ourselves into opposing camps at war with one another. As Jesus himself said, “Every kingdom divided against itself becomes a desert, and house falls on house.” (Luke 11:17) The more we divide the weaker and less effective we become in sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
While not compromising Himself by conforming to or adopting the ways of the world, Jesus didn’t isolate himself from people living sinful lives, as we currently seem to be doing by saying who we will and won’t associate with. But rather, he ate and drank and socialized with them. His presence amongst them brought transformation and healing into their brokenness. It is time that we recognize that we are all broken and that our enemy is not the person who thinks differently than we do, but Satan and the powers of evil who are intent on confusing, dividing and destroying us. If we are to overcome the chaos, confusion and division that threaten our Church, we must unite with one another in and through the Lord Jesus Christ. Unity for unity sake is of little value. True meaningful unity within the Church can only occur in and through Christ. As you have heard me say over and over again, we must keep our focus on Christ as we go through the midst of the current storm we find ourselves in. Jesus is “the Way, and the Truth and the Life.” (John 14:6) If we come humbly before the Lord, seeking His guidance, He will lead us, giving us the grace we need to work with those of a different mind, while we work toward a common understanding. I am not suggesting that it will be easy, but just the opposite. It will take tremendous effort, great humility, forgiveness, patience, understanding, and grace, depending not upon ourselves, but rather upon our Lord Jesus Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit working in and through us. Apart from Christ we will fail, but in and through Christ ALL things are possible. It is for this reason that I have hope and am unwilling to write this person or that person or this group or that group off. I am constantly reminded of Paul’s Damascus Road experience and how an encounter with the Risen Lord Jesus Christ, turned one of the greatest enemies of the Church into one of the greatest saints of the Church.
A member of our Diocese recently emailed me and asked, “Can you give me any good reason (s) why I should remain a member of TEC (The Episcopal Church)?” In response to my friend who asked this question and to all the others who are thinking it, I offer the following reasons:
ï® The Diocese of Albany including each of its parishes is The Episcopal Church within the 19 counties and 20,000 square miles that make up its borders.
ï® The Bishop and leadership of this Diocese are Christ centered, and are committed to helping the Diocese live out The Great Commandment and The Great Commission, sharing the love and Good News of Jesus Christ, proclaiming Him as Lord and Savior, The Way, the Truth and the Life.
ï® The Lord is doing a mighty work in the Diocese of Albany, pouring out his Holy Spirit on the various ministries of the Diocese, particularly in the ministry of healing.
ï® At its best, The Episcopal Church as a member of the Anglican Communion has much to offer the larger Church, through its rich history, liturgy and tradition as well as its unique position uniting the best of Catholicism and Protestantism into one faith.
ï® The Episcopal Church and Anglican Communion, although far from perfect, are worth fighting for. There is no perfect Church this side of Heaven. And yet even in our brokenness, God’s strength can shine forth.
ï® You are a unique child of God, created in His image and likeness. We love and need you. I say this to all the members of this Diocese, regardless of where you find yourselves on the theological spectrum.
While being very conscious of the length of this letter and your time in reading it, there are a couple more things that I need to comment on. Regarding that which was asked by the Primates of the Anglican Communion, while I can’t speak for the entire House of Bishops, I will speak for myself as the Bishop of Albany and a member of the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church.
1) I will not authorize or permit any Rite of Blessing (public or private) for same-sex unions in this Diocese for the following reasons:
ï® There is no Biblical president or support in either the Old or New Testament for such blessings. To do so would be encouraging individuals to live in a lifestyle that I believe is contrary to God’s Word as revealed in the teachings of Holy Scripture and 2000 years of Church tradition, and is therefore not in a person’s best interest to do so.
ï® I recognize that many in our Church see this as a “justice issue.” I strongly believe that the Church has a responsibility to fight injustice protecting the dignity of all human beings, and to reach out and minister to all people including those who find themselves to be homosexual. The Church needs to reassure all people of God’s love for them and His gift of salvation made possible for all who believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, accepting Him as Lord and Savior. While God loves ALL His children, He does not necessarily approve of or bless all of our behavior. For this reason and the reasons listed above, I believe the Church would in fact be doing a great injustice to our homosexual brothers and sisters in Christ, by blessing same sex unions, even when those unions are within the confines of a loving and committed relationship.
ï® As a member of the Anglican Communion, I believe The Episcopal Church has a responsibility to the other members of the Communion who have clearly stated that such blessings are not appropriate and in fact to authorize them would cause great pain, suffering and damage throughout the wider Communion.
2) While the interpretation of Resolution BO33 of the 75th General Convention seems to be
somewhat debatable, depending on who you talk to, as the Bishop of Albany, I will not
consent to any candidate for Episcopal orders living in a same sex union or anyone
involved in sexual relations outside of marriage between a man and woman, unless some
new consensus on these matters emerges across the Communion. I make this
commitment for the same reasons listed above. I would remind us that in 1991,
the General Convention passed Resolution B020, addressing “human sexuality issues.” It concluded by saying, “these potentially divisive issues”¦ should not be resolved by the
Episcopal Church on its own.” Unfortunately, we failed to heed our own warning which
proved to be very prophetic.
3) In regard to lawsuits, I believe every effort should be made by the Church to avoid going
to court over property issues. Once you go to court, everyone loses, the Diocese, the
Parish, the local community and the Church at large. There has to be a more Christian
manor of resolving legal disputes than the one currently being employed by the National
Church in dioceses across the country. I applaud those bishops who have tried to deal
with these issues in a pastoral way.
Finally in reference to the meeting of the Common Cause Partnership in Pittsburgh, as mentioned at the beginning of this letter, I did attend the meeting as an observer. I believe I have a responsibility as your bishop to be as informed as I can be regarding the current situation facing our Church. As I stated at the Diocesan Convention in June, it is my hope and prayer that we never have to decide between the Episcopal Church and the wider Anglican Communion. We are currently a member of both. God willing, we will stay that way. You will recall at the Diocesan Convention, I stated if either The Episcopal Church or the Anglican Communion took any action that would require us to choose between one or the other, I would call for a Special Convention, at which time we would come together as a Diocese to decide how best to respond to whatever confronts us. To date, there is no need for such an action. Again, I pray there never will be.
With that said, as much as I love The Episcopal Church (even with all its current frustrations) and as much as I love the Anglican Communion, I love the Lord Jesus Christ most of all. As your bishop, I will do everything within my power, through the grace of God and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, to remain Christ centered, seeking His will in all that we do, as we move forward living out The Great Commandment and The Great Commission. May we never loose sight of who we are as children of God and the mission entrusted to us by our Lord Himself, to go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything He has commanded. In so doing, our Lord promised he would never leave us, but would be with us to the end of the age.” God’s peace.
Faithfully Yours in Christ,
(The Rt. Rev. Bill Love is Bishop of Albany
Bp Bill is a genuinely good — even holy — man.
However, I beg to differ on a few things he said. I can’t help but believe that it is far too late to fix TEC and its relations with the
Anglican Communion. No one who has been actively involved in the battles of the recent past can help but see that “turning it around” is no longer an option.
I seriously do not want to see anyone on this blog taking any shots at all at Bp Bill’s personal integrity (NO pun intended). He has great strength and determination and will do whatever it takes to follow the leading that God gives him. The orthodox clergy of this diocese want to be able to support and uphold him, but we need to be given real opportunities to do that.
I just dearly wish that he would come to see the leading of God into a more genuinely orthodox place sooner rather than later.
We ARE undoubtedly going to have to choose between TEC and authentic Anglican Christianity. As a Diocese we need to start doing the actual concrete work in order to get into the right place on this. It will be much harder to get to that place all at once after the boat has sailed.
ALSO — the people of our diocese need to know that our happy little Northern New York bubble is just an illusion. At least 70% to 85% percent of our people and clergy are solidly orthodox, and TEC does not have a place for us to be who we are. Clergy and leadership need to have a real and open venue to get ourselves into a real unity in our commitment to Jesus Christ. Let’s trust that, pull together and proclaim an orthodox consensus NOW.
I appreciated his list of reasons for why folks should stay with his diocese.
One of the things I have noticed, however, is that the informed, traditional Episcopalians will generally only stay if you provide 1) a concrete vision of what and where and how you would like to renew and reform the diocese and how it might affect or impact other areas of ECUSA and the Anglican Communion in regards to the current issues that are confronting ECUSA and the Anglican Communion [which necessarily means far more than “fulfill the Great Commission”], 2) a community of like-minded Episcopalians to work together, and 3) real work to do in accomplishing that vision within that community.
I suspect that the reason why bishops don’t offer those things is that they themselves have no clear or concrete vision, no community building experience amongst that particular segment, and no idea of the concrete actions that such a community might take.
It’s a pity, because without those three things, that particular segment will leave.
Sounds like he is commited to staying unless TEC is officially booted. I did like the part about dealing with departing parishes in a “pastoral way.”
Even more pitiable, Sarah, is that many priests were elected bishops exactly because part of their skill sets included the ability to establish concrete goals and accomplish them. You said,
[blockquote] I suspect that the reason why bishops don’t offer those things is that they themselves have no clear or concrete vision, no community building experience amongst that particular segment, and no idea of the concrete actions that such a community might take.[/blockquote]
One of the reasons such a skill set is palpably valuable in bishops in the first place is because it is in short supply among the rest of the clergy. Which means that the missions and parishes suffer for the same lack, especially if there are no other parishioners who can fill that gap. Perhaps you have some semblance of such (a) concrete vision, and the corresponding action plans in your book. I regret I haven’t read it to find out. In the meantime, perhaps you would briefly mention some of that/them here for the benefit of Albany, other dioceses, and – personally – my parish and other congregations looking and hungry for the same. If this is a portion of your book, then at the least a discussion here would undoubtedly assist the sales! : )
RGEaton
Check out Fr. Tom Herrick’s church plant workshop for a method of establishing concrete vision and action plans for a church.
Given Judith’s comment, I should clarify my request to Sarah. I do not mean the basic set of goals and objectives necessary, as Fr. Herrick ably articulates. I mean especially those pointed, as Sarah said, “to renew and reform the diocese and how it might affect or impact other areas of ECUSA and the Anglican Communion in regards to the current issues that are confronting ECUSA and the Anglican Communion [which necessarily means far more than “fulfill the Great Commission”].”
RGEaton
This is a holy, prayerful, godly reflection by a real Bishop. There has been enormous healing in this Diocese because there is no question about the integrity of this man and it is compellingly transparent even to those who oppose his orthodox position on “the issues.”
The jumping on our bishops “to do something” is finally not nearly as important as what we do ourselves. If our investment does not run deeper than getting our frustration-ticket punched and into the core spirit of this bishop, there’s nothing to save anyway.
Temperamentally, spiritually, Bishop Love’s “tone of heart” is what Anglicanism is suppose to be. If that can’t be recovered, then it’s time to walk away. Looking at Bishop Love, I have reason to hope so much more than by the strident “action” takers.
Bishop Love reminds me the “action” begins within and indeed finally ends there — at least that’s the Anglicanism that I’ll fight for.
Whether or not I agree with the good Bishop, I greatly respect the integrity that is expressed here. He does not sound to be under the sway of any other group of Bishops.
That said, why didn’t someone proof-read his text? Argh!
This is a godly reflection from an orthodox Bishop. Yet, these guys talk like “all will be well” in our Diocese. “I will never allow SSB, so long as I’m your Bishop….This won’t happen in this diocese…yada, yada, yada” It brings to mind what can happen with heresy. First, you fight like mad against it. Then, you tolerate it. Then, you may even begin to believe it. When I see reflections like Bishop Love’s, it really speaks to the second phase…you will tolerate heresy.
Yes, +Love, you were elected Bishop of Albany, but you are a Bishop of the whole church. We need you to take bold action to get your people out of this rampant heresy among us. At the very least, you need to do all you can to bring discipline to those who
are preaching a false gospel. If you believe you can not be a part of bringing disciplinary action, then get your people out of TEC.
Battered Orthodox Episcopalian Syndrome: “They tell me it will get better. They send me flowers. Yet, the cycle of abuse continues.” As much as I admire this particular bishop, and as much as I understand his position, much of what I read these days is not a vision for being conduits of the Kingdom of God to planet earth. It is more like the rationalization for continuing the cycle of abuse. When you quote Scripture to continue in the cycle of abuse…. it is called enabling in our psycho-babble, Episco-speak.
What I would rather hear is not all of the potential benefits of keeping an earthly institution (which is distinct, brothers and sisters, from the mystical body of Christ in my view) but the simple truth about Jesus, the prophets, the saints, and martyrs. If the postmodern context turns our church post-Christian, just tell us that is the very cross we are to bear. When they slap us, tell us to turn the other cheek. When they revile us, tell us to respond to curses with blessing. When they seek to eviscerate us as a movement from our beloved (hopefully not idolatrously so) church, tell me to pray for the Father to forgive them in their ignorance.
But please do not tell me to engage in a listening process as if darkness and light can learn from each other as co-equal partners, or patronize me with the idea that the unity Jesus prayed for has anything to do with light and darkness linking arms as “our gift to the wider church.” Give me an aggressive prayer strategy for those who persecute me, but don’t act like I can blog or sound bite them with zingers until. There are people in the House of Bishops who need to be converted, not accommodated in fellowship, who are in desperate need of receiving the saving love of God in Christ Jesus into their hearts. They need to be pursued in love, with truth leading the way.
The proof is in the pudding. +Bill Love spends seven-eighths of his letter rationizing his desire to stay in TEC and one-eighth making passing reference to being only an observer (mentioned twice) at Common Cause with not one other impression about Albany’s future in Common Cause –certainly no ringing endorsement of CCP here. This report does not engender much hope for the future of the Diocese of Albany.
Well. A painful comparison, this and the preceding blog. LM
So, now that the TEC Bishops have served up the fudge while giving the finger, and at best you’ve got Duncan, Iker, and Schofield out of the entire church who appear not to be sellouts, what are you guys gonna do next? Will there be another meeting, another resolution?
Archbishop Akinola, Bishop Bena, I’m begging you. Please send a missionary priest to Albany. This diocese will never leave TEC.
Albany came close, they could have elected as bishop, the new rector of Truro, Tory Baucum who at the time of the election was already out of TEC (Diocese of London) but he ended up second. One of my buds in Albany told me the mantra of the time was “All we need is Love”
Patience is a virtue. Pastoral patience these days in TEC, however, can be toxic. Unless one has concluded that the vocation of orthodox Christians in TEC is take up the cross of marginalization, insult, law suit and guilt-by-association, the commitment to stay until kicked out is worse than naive: it is disingenuous! Ms. Schori and David Beers do not have to kick anyone out. All those who stay in a denomination which overtly repudiates the Christian Faith will have to consider whether they are un-intended collaborators in the slow demise of that Faith within TEC.
Words of wisdom from Bishop Live.
I am not a football fan but what I see is a football game.
TEC receives the ball on the 30 yard line and punts the ball back to the Primates hoping for better field position. (We in Albany remain on the TEC sideline waiting and some of us are rooting for the Primates (both are sick).) When the Primates punt it back they too continue to play in this charade. We all wait on the sideline while the players continue to move up and down the field. TEC looking for better field position–Arch . Bishop Rowan looking for better field position– the Primates looking for better field position..
I have never liked being on the sidelines watching a game when you know the outcome. Can we not all see the game is over on this field?
We all are sucked down in this pit even as we read and blog—how much time do we spend on these web sites actually talking about building the Kingdom vs the GAME. While we watch this game–we end up angry,– without mission,– without passion ,– soft and numb—HOPING FOR A DRAW?
The fact is we know the price has already been paid and victory was won.. Just leave the ball on the field, do not pick it up, do not return the punt, the game is finished. It is time to leave this field. Just leave this field as it is not of God. It is time to leave this arena behind. Where is Moses when you need him?
This field –the boundaries are vague, sometimes disappeared and the players have risen to a level of arrogance to tell the author of the rule book they now are changing it–what HE said we were to do. God is clear.
We have made man our referee and we all know there is only one judge. He has given us the rules, he has given the boundaries and we know the final outcome.
I know the game is done, some feel a draw is possible—NOT. There already has been a victory.
Ray Farrara
Anyone in the Diocese of Albany who needs a shoulder to cry on can find ample love in the Diocese of South Carolina. Here, we are told to “stay the course” but the “course” is not one on which we want to play. We have had the carrot of “something good is about to happen” dangled in our face so many times that we have sworn off all garden variety vegetables. We are told that strength in numbers is the only way to go. They say individual parishes should in no way consider leaving. If indeed we leave (which I sincerely doubt will happen), we should leave as an entire diocese. But one of the good things you folks in Albany have going for you is not having to deal with your neighboring bishop to the west. I have some family members who still reside in the Syracuse diocese and I’m told they spend all day, every day either angry or sobbing. Regardless, have faith my friends. When TEC, the Primates, Common Cause, and Rowan Williams run out of cities in which to meet, something positive just might happen. In the meantime, my priests are begging me to stay. My brain is telling me to leave. My feet are somewhere in between. A trinity of raw emotions, what?