Reform: Pre Synod Statement

Rod Thomas explains his thinking going in to the Nov. 2013 General Synod
Posted on 18 November 2013

The approach taken by the Legislative Steering Group was to tie its discussions fairly tightly to the terms of last July’s General Synod motion. This meant that some issues which have always been regarded as important by those arguing for better ”˜provision’ were not covered (eg issues of jurisdiction). Nevertheless, within those confines, members of the Group were listening to each other carefully and seeking to respond positively. The end result was a balanced package of proposals which show more sensitivity to the needs of those who cannot accept the ministry of women bishops than those in the previous draft Measure. However, key issues remain unresolved. These include the issue of jurisdiction, the rights of individuals, difficulties over enforcement, and the nature of the oath of canonical obedience. While we are prepared to see the proposals going forward for further Synodical consideration, as the most practicable way forward in our present circumstances, it is important to be clear that if major concerns remain at final approval, we will not support them. We will continue to engage positively in Synodical discussions in order to achieve an outcome that is fair to all.

Read it all

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, Anglican Provinces, Church of England (CoE), CoE Bishops

2 comments on “Reform: Pre Synod Statement

  1. Ad Orientem says:

    No one should be under any illusions. What is happening is the complete victory of the pro- W/O side. I will add a minor and relatively safe prediction (based on history). Whatever very limited tolerance is promised for orthodox Anglicans will vanish within a decade.

    And I am perfectly fine with that. The sooner clarity is established, the sooner the so called Traditionalists will be stripped of whatever straw they cling to as justification for remaining in a communion that has so brazenly repudiated the Biblical and immemorial teaching of the church catholic.

  2. Sarah says:

    RE: “The sooner clarity is established, the sooner the so called Traditionalists will be stripped of whatever straw they cling to as justification for remaining in a communion . . . ”

    Claptrap, once again. Clarity is a wonderful thing indeed, and such clarity does no such thing within *any* organization at all.