Writing about the age of John Milton, the British author A. N. Wilson once tried to explain to modern secular readers that there had once been a time when bishops of the Church of England were titanic figures of conviction who were ready to stand against the culture. “It needs an act of supreme historical imagination to be able to recapture an atmosphere in which Anglican bishops might be taken seriously,” he wrote, “still more, one in which they might be thought threatening.”
Keep that in mind as you read the news that the General Synod of the Church of England voted yesterday to approve the consecration of women as bishops of the church.
The votes came less than two years after a similar measure failed to gain the necessary two-thirds vote before the same synod. The election of women as bishops had sailed through the bishops and the clergy, but opposition from lay members of the synod had blocked the measure late in 2012.
What few even in the British media are now mentioning is the massive pressure brought upon the church by the larger British culture and, most specifically, from the British government.
It is extremely instructive if one takes the time to compare Al’s piece with that of Ephraim Radner’s in First Things (daily). Mohler’s review of the machinations employed to achieve the desired result are at considerable odds to Radner’s “polity with integrity” stance.
Which perspective is the most accurate portrayal of the last 25 years within the CoE?
Carl+, aren’t machinations the work of the Holy Spirit when achieving the politically correct ends desired by over-riding the established modus operandus and the work of the devil when those upholding the modus operandus stop the headlong rush over the cliff? Why even the ABC Welby was threatening to act if this current crop got led any other way than the PC way.
dwstroundmd+, no doubt! You just keep at the Holy Spirit and sooner or later, He just caves in. Then you talk about how it was “polity with integrity”, which makes overriding Truth ok!
Mohler understands what’s at stake far better than many Anglicans do.