Living Church: Get Church Out of Marriage Business, Barbara Harris Tells Integrity Eucharist

[Barbara] Harris referred briefly to a reading from Acts about St. Peter hearing God’s call to welcome Gentiles into the church. Otherwise, her sermon was a collection of barbs””most aimed at conservatives, but with a few challenging her fellow progressives.
”” “Unfortunately, many people who need to be reminded of these truths are not here,” she said, referring to the lesson from Acts.
”” “Some glibly speak of our diversity. ”¦ I am reminded that there was diversity at the Tower of Babel.”
”” Resolution B033 was “not just a grudging response to the Windsor Report, but a ticket ”¦ to attend the Lambeth Conference and to make false peace.”
”” The Archbishop of Canterbury’s message to General Convention, as condensed by Bishop Harris: “Don’t make another unilateral move on the Communion chess board.”
”” “If you don’t want GLBT folks as bishops, don’t ordain them as transitional deacons.”
”” “Better yet, don’t baptize them in the first place.”
”” “Don’t initiate someone and then act like they’re half-ass baptized.”

Read it all.

I now will take comments on this submitted by email only to at KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com

print

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, Archbishop of Canterbury, Episcopal Church (TEC), General Convention, Instruments of Unity, Same-sex blessings, Sexuality Debate (in Anglican Communion), TEC Bishops

4 comments on “Living Church: Get Church Out of Marriage Business, Barbara Harris Tells Integrity Eucharist

  1. mannainthewilderness says:

    [i] Sarcastic comment deleted by elf. [/i]

  2. The_Elves says:

    [i] Please don’t make our job more difficult today. [/i]

    -Elf Lady

  3. Kendall Harmon says:

    There is a way to respond to this without being unduly sarcastic, personal or demeaning to the speaker as opposed to disagreeing with and indeed seeking to combat her arguments. The comments have alas failed in this regard.

  4. Kendall Harmon says:

    From Driver8–

    This is, in fact, a plea for a major departure from recent Anglican theology and is a rejection of agreed statements with which the Episcopal Church once concurred. Have we not agreed in our various ecumenical conversations that Christian marriage is rather more than just a civil contract? If marriage is a sacrament (a visible sign of God’s invisible grace) or has something sacramental about it – then simply devolving it to the secular state is an abandonment of our responsibilities.

    Thus for example the ARCIC report on marriage

    1 That in Christian marriage the man and the woman themselves make the covenant whereby they enter into marriage as instituted and ordained by God; this new unity, the unity of marriage, is sacramental in virtue of their Christian baptism and is the work of God in Christ.

    2 That this marriage once made possesses a unity given by God to respect which is a primary duty; this duty creates secondary obligations for the Church in both its pastoral and its legislative capacity. One is the obligation to discourage marriages in which the unity would be so strained or so lacking in vitality as to be both a source of danger to the parties themselves and to be a disfigured sign of or defective witness to the unity of Christ with his Church. Another is the obligation to concert its pastoral care and legislative provisions to support the unity of the marriage once it is made and to ensure as best it can that these provisions be not even unwittingly divisive.