WSJ: The contradictory faces of political Islam in post-Mubarak Egypt

“All Egyptians now think they are Che Guevara, Castro or something,” says Essam el-Erian, a senior leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, bursting into laughter. “This is democracy.”

Amid this political ferment, the Brotherhood is an exception: a well-funded, organized and established force. Founded in 1928, it’s also the grandaddy of the Mideast’s political Islamist movements. The Brotherhood was banned from politics 57 years ago and focused on business, charity and social ventures. But the secretive fraternity always aspired to power.

Now free elections due later this year offer the Brotherhood their best opportunity. The group says it believes in “Islamic democracy,” but what does that really mean? I spent a week with members of the Muslim Brotherhood, and it turns out the answers are far from monolithic, though often far from reassuring.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, * Economics, Politics, * International News & Commentary, * Religion News & Commentary, Egypt, Islam, Middle East, Other Faiths, Politics in General, Religion & Culture

One comment on “WSJ: The contradictory faces of political Islam in post-Mubarak Egypt

  1. nwlayman says:

    Talking about Castro & Che is talking about “democracy”? Ask a Cuban. If it’s that *or* the Muslim brotherhood, well, it’s like Hitler *or* Stalin. No reason to support either one now, just see where the chips fall. Either way it’s a ghastly thought to be trying to live in Egypt as a Christian.