Spinning the General Convention would be more accurate as a purpose.
Appropriate critiques, even Conger’s, are mentioned in regard to the WSJ article, but more time is devoted to spin consideration than any story about DioMO or what the Bishop voted for or against. And this from a diocese that voted to continue support to the Sudan to “get our version of the gospel to them” despite the hurt felt by the critique of the Episcopal adventures in mis-sexuality by the Archbishop of the Sudan.
It doesn’t surprise me that they would use Conger. The way he only focussed on the bad side of the WSJ article was peculiar – he even ignored some of its good points that many liberal members of TEC agree on.
Spinning the General Convention would be more accurate as a purpose.
Appropriate critiques, even Conger’s, are mentioned in regard to the WSJ article, but more time is devoted to spin consideration than any story about DioMO or what the Bishop voted for or against. And this from a diocese that voted to continue support to the Sudan to “get our version of the gospel to them” despite the hurt felt by the critique of the Episcopal adventures in mis-sexuality by the Archbishop of the Sudan.
It doesn’t surprise me that they would use Conger. The way he only focussed on the bad side of the WSJ article was peculiar – he even ignored some of its good points that many liberal members of TEC agree on.