Long long overdue and worth some scrutiny.
[i]update: We’re “bumping” this up the page, since the Anglican Ink website is now working again after one or two days of problems. — the elves.[/i]
Long long overdue and worth some scrutiny.
[i]update: We’re “bumping” this up the page, since the Anglican Ink website is now working again after one or two days of problems. — the elves.[/i]
The link does not work. Going to the main webpage and clicking on title of the article ends with the same result: 404 Not Found
[i]it appears Anglican Ink is down. (Perhaps all the hits from T19 crashed the site?!). Keep trying. You can see the cache of Anglican Ink as of July 4 here:
[url=http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?biw=1252&bih=546&sclient=psy-ab&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fanglicanink.com%2F&oq=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fanglicanink.com%2F&gs_l=hp.3…7368.12143.1.12884.87.34.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0….34…1c.1.19.psy-ab.0fg4ubks8x0&pbx=1]Anglican Ink Cache[/url] – elves[/i]
I was mildly disappointed with Geralyn Wolf in RI, and mildly surprised on the positive side by +Miller in Milwaukee and a couple others. Of course, a few revisionists with traditional dioceses who voted “no” once the issue was no longer in doubt, so as to look good back home. Other than that, it is a bit amusing that a church that redesigns its website (and its theology) annually still uses a 17th century typeface for reporting the HoB proceedings. Must make them feel very traditional and bishop-like.