“Papal Gambit Stuns Church” was how The Times of London headlined its front page Oct. 21. Inside, an editorial thundered that Rome’s newly announced legal structure allowing Anglicans to join the Catholic Church without giving up their rites and traditions had “dangerously weakened” Anglicanism. The editors said that Pope Benedict XVI stands accused of damaging church unity and ecumenical cooperation.
It was gloriously retro, as if out of an 1850 Punch cartoon showing a sinister pope and cardinal trying to force their way through a door over the caption: “Daring attempt to break into a church.” The Times’s metaphors””Rome was “annexing” parts of the Church of England, parking its tanks on Lambeth’s lawns, fishing in troubled Anglican water””glossed over important facts. The move was announced by the archbishops of Canterbury and Westminster together; the pope was responding to insistent requests from disaffected Anglicans who had decided in conscience they could no longer remain in the Church of England; he had not done so before out of fear of undermining Anglican unity; and he was doing so now with an imaginative piece of canonical engineering that could do more to thaw relations between the Catholic and Anglican churches than anything since their official unity talks began in the 1970s.
Still, the sense of violation was real””not least because the papal bombshell had dropped out of a clear blue sky with little warning. The former archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, was outraged that his successor, Rowan Williams, learned of the move only two weeks previously and had been notified formally only when the prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal William Levada, visited London the weekend before. But even Lord Carey admitted that the proposal had vast potential. “Straightforward ecumenism at the theological level is going nowhere,” he said. “This fresh initiative could have surprising consequences.”
The ABC, AC, and TEC completely deserve to have a healthy dose of reality-inducing shock therapy. I’ll probably die a TEC priest in my old age, but I’m delighted that the Patriarch of the West has recognized the value and truth inherent in the Anglican sacred tradition. With this addition, the Vatican has a full range of historic Christian products.
[blockquote]And what happens when a large group of very conservative clergymen enters the life of the Catholic Church in England and Wales, a group defined by an embattled struggle against gay and female ordinations in their own church? What happens when we solve our priest shortage with such men?[/blockquote]
Well, I suspect that not a few orthodox RCs, including His Holiness, are silently smiling at the likely fruits of this infusion. And, not a few liberal RCs, including a whole lot of the readers of [i]America[/i], are not-so-silently gnashing their teeth.
Hey, the gambit has a long shelf life: see below for 400 years of patience and overtures since early 1900s:
http://new.kendallharmon.net/wp-content/uploads/index.php/t19/article/26300/#comments
Given the glacially slow current ABC, this undoubtedly seems hasty. He’s on record as stating that Arius has/had some good ideas, too. So his surprise is nothing new………………………………….