Ken Connor–Vive La France: The Same Sax Marriage Debate is About the Children

For years, the LGBT movement has invoked the twin spectres of equality and human rights in their war against traditional marriage. Defenders of the “one man, one woman” model for marriage have been slandered as hateful bigots who would relegate same-sex couples to second-class status. We’ve been told that the “march towards marriage equality” is inevitable, that we’re on the “wrong side of history.” We’ve been told that the embrace of alternative relationship models is the way of the future.

As society continues to “progress” towards greater equality and enlightenment, more and more people will recognize that traditional notions of gender and sex are stifling and archaic. Increasingly, it’s being asserted that opposition to this view constitutes a danger to society that must be eliminated through force of law. Freedom of speech and religion are being threatened in the name of tolerance and equality. If the LGBT agenda is successful, defenders of traditional marriage will be hamstrung in their efforts by the threat of legal prosecution and the certainty of social ostracism.

In the face of such vitriol, traditionalists have struggled to find a coherent, compassionate, and compelling response. We’ve allowed the histrionics of hyperbole and red herring tactics to distract and disorient us. In France, there is no such confusion. Defenders of traditional marriage are very clear about why the institution must remain as it’s always been: it’s about the children.

Read it all.


Posted in * Culture-Watch, * International News & Commentary, --Civil Unions & Partnerships, Anthropology, Children, Ethics / Moral Theology, Europe, France, Law & Legal Issues, Marriage & Family, Sexuality, Theology

One comment on “Ken Connor–Vive La France: The Same Sax Marriage Debate is About the Children

  1. Sick & Tired of Nuance says:

    In the beginning God created one man and one woman. He could have created any number of women for Adam, or vice versa any number of men for Eve. That He did not gives us an insight to the designer’s intent that none of the later permutations and alterations can abrogate. God intended for marriage to be between one man and one woman. As it was in the beginning…