NY Times Letters on the Editorial–Legalize Marijuana? Responses Vary

Here is one:

Your opinion, in “Repeal Prohibition, Again,” that marijuana should be legalized is based in part on an assumption that during Prohibition “people kept drinking.” Prohibition reduced the public’s alcohol intake considerably. The rate of alcohol-associated illness dropped in similar fashion. Prohibition was perhaps a political failure, but an impressive success from a public health standpoint.

Both alcohol and marijuana can lead to the chronic disease of addiction, directly affect the brain and negatively affect function. As more than 10 percent of our population has addictive disease, your statement that marijuana is “far less dangerous than alcohol” doesn’t reflect decades of research demonstrating risks associated with both of these drugs.

Why would we possibly wish to add to the alcohol- and tobacco-driven personal and public health catastrophe with yet another substance to which some people will become addicted?

Some people use marijuana currently. Legalize it, and more people will use more marijuana, leading to more addiction, lower productivity and higher societal costs….

Read them all.


Posted in * Culture-Watch, * Economics, Politics, Alcohol/Drinking, Alcoholism, Drugs/Drug Addiction, Economy, Ethics / Moral Theology, Health & Medicine, History, House of Representatives, Law & Legal Issues, Media, Office of the President, Police/Fire, Politics in General, Senate, The U.S. Government, Theology

One comment on “NY Times Letters on the Editorial–Legalize Marijuana? Responses Vary

  1. St. Jimbob of the Apokalypse says:

    Many of this generation don’t care about risks and long-term impacts to society. The only gauge of good/bad is “does this make me feel good right now”. Marijuana, same-sex unions, whatever. Myopia unto destruction..