In recent years, John Walton, professor of Old Testament at Wheaton College, has been both lauded and criticized for his interpretation of Genesis 1”“2. In his 2009 landmark book, The Lost World of Genesis One (InterVarsity Press), he argued that to rightly understand Genesis 1””an ancient document””we need to read it within the context of the ancient world. Read alongside other ancient texts, he says, Genesis 1 is not about how God made the world, but about God assigning functions to every aspect of it. In 2013, Walton contributed a chapter in Four Views on the Historical Adam (Zondervan). There he argued that Adam was a historical person, but also that Adam’s primary function in Scripture is to represent all of humanity. For Walton, Genesis 1”“2 is not concerned about human material origins, but rather about our God-given function and purpose: to be in relationship with God and work alongside him, as his image bearers, in bringing continued order to our world.
Walton spoke recently with CT assistant editor Kevin P. Emmert about his newest book, The Lost World of Adam and Eve: Genesis 2”“3 and the Human Origins Debate (IVP Academic).
i haven’t looked into this and I am willing to consider anything on its merits.
But I do wonder about anything which may be aimed at some sort of a compact with the theory of evolution. Leaving aside all theological issues, evolution simply doesn’t make sense. It doesn’t fit the available evidence. Even if the Bible did not exist, mankind would still have to candidly admit that there really isn’t any “theory” for origins, just a number of hypotheses that might or might not be true.