Episcopal Rector Randal Gardner Interviewed by the San Diego Reader

SDR: Where do you go when you die?

RG: Something endures, I believe, whether it endures in a physical form as scripture suggests, or as a contribution of some little intelligence to the universe or whether there’s memory, I’m not really sure. I’m pretty faithful to preach what scripture teaches, but as far as how that is actually going to be manifest for us, I’m not entirely sure, but I don’t really care. Whatever it is, I’m confident that God is good, and if it’s to be nothing, so be it”¦. One of the best metaphors for articulating what I think is from C. S. Lewis’s The Great Divorce. Hell is a state of continuing refusal toward God, which one can leave at any time. In his telling of the story, the torment is more from the consequence of continuing disconnection from the brightness and reality and graciousness of God. One gets stuck in one’s own narcissism or selfishness or fear or dread or some kind of addictive pattern of refusal, and that is the hell.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, * Christian Life / Church Life, Episcopal Church (TEC), Eschatology, Ministry of the Ordained, Parish Ministry, Theology

5 comments on “Episcopal Rector Randal Gardner Interviewed by the San Diego Reader

  1. Larry Morse says:

    But I don’t really care.” This is the paradigmatic liberal on gospel matters. Why should he care? He doesn’t? So what? Larry

  2. Laura R. says:

    [blockquote] I’m pretty faithful to preach what scripture teaches, but as far as how that is actually going to be manifest for us, I’m not entirely sure, but I don’t really care. Whatever it is, I’m confident that God is good, and if it’s to be nothing, so be it…. [/blockquote]

    Scripture doesn’t teach that the Christian hope of life after death is nothing.

    And I don’t think the Rev. Mr. Gardner understands C. S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce very well either.

  3. driver8 says:

    If someone could explain how these various affirmations are non-contradictory I would be very grateful.

  4. John Wilkins says:

    I think there is some scriptural evidence that Jesus was more interested in the kingdom being near than anxiety about the afterlife.

    The afterlife is our preoccupation. Not God’s. One would hope that God is concerned with our lives, here now, not a puppetmaster eager to punish and reward. That’s a very anthropomorphic God.

  5. driver8 says:

    There’s rather more evidence that Jesus didn’t contrast the now and the not yet of the kingdom at all. The force of such a contrast is however particularly evident amongst many modern western Christians.