(FS) Alysse ElHage–For Kids, Parental Cohabitation and Marriage Are Not Interchangeable

While some cohabiting adults seem happy enough to live together without marriage, what about their children? It is an important question considering that about one in four American children today are born to cohabiting parents. According to Child Trends, the number of cohabiting couples with children under 18 has nearly tripled since the late 1990s””increasing from 1.2 million in 1996 to 3.1 million in 2014. The National Center for Health Statistics reports that the majority of recent non-marital births (58 percent) are to unmarried women living with their child’s father.

On the surface, the trend away from divorced or unwed mothers raising kids on their own, toward more children living with both of their parents, seems like a positive one for children raised outside of marriage. However, when it comes to child well-being, cohabiting unions more closely resemble single motherhood than marriage. As eighteen noted family scholars stated in a 2011 report from the National Marriage Project, “cohabitation is not the functional equivalent of marriage,” and it is “the largely unrecognized threat to the quality and stability of children’s lives today.”

For children, the differences between cohabiting and married parents extend far beyond the lack of a marriage license. Compared to children of married parents, those with cohabiting parents are more likely to experience the breakup of their families, be exposed to “complex” family forms, live in poverty, suffer abuse, and have negative psychological and educational outcomes.

Read it all.

print

Posted in * Culture-Watch, Anthropology, Children, Ethics / Moral Theology, Health & Medicine, Marriage & Family, Pastoral Theology, Psychology, Sociology, Theology

One comment on “(FS) Alysse ElHage–For Kids, Parental Cohabitation and Marriage Are Not Interchangeable

  1. Jim the Puritan says:

    Although these arguments now always get pooh-poohed with gay “marriage,”and even by the courts, a fundamental purpose of marriage from the government’s perspective was to protect the children. This is why a married couple’s assets are usually legally protected from creditors and they get certain tax treatment. It isn’t because they are “married,” per se. It is to protect the children.