Perhaps some joining of Catholics and evangelicals, in morals and manners, could achieve the social unity in theological difference that characterized the old Mainline. But the vast intellectual resources of Catholicism still sound a little odd in the American ear, just as the enormous reservoir of evangelical faith has been unable, thus far, to provide a widely accepted moral rhetoric.
America was Methodist, once upon a time””or Baptist, or Presbyterian, or Congregationalist, or Episcopalian. Protestant, in other words. What can we call it today? Those churches simply don’t mean much any more. That’s a fact of some theological significance. It’s a fact of genuine sorrow, for that matter, as the aging members of the old denominations watch their congregations dwindle away: funeral after funeral, with far too few weddings and baptisms in between. But future historians, telling the story of our age, will begin with the public effect in the United States.
As he prepared to leave the presidency in 1796, George Washington famously warned, “Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.” Generally speaking, however, Americans tended not to worry much about the philosophical question of religion and nation. The whole theologico-political problem, which obsessed European philosophers, was gnawed at in the United States most by those who were least churched.
We all have to worry about it, now. Without the political theory that depended on the existence of the Protestant Mainline, what does it mean to support the nation? What does it mean to criticize it? The American experiment has always needed what Alexis de ÂTocqueville called the undivided current, and now that current has finally run dry.
Mainline/oldline members — if you read this, you want to go straight out to watch “The Dark Knight” so you can cheer up afterwards.
I only wish i could find a phrase or word to dispute in this analysis. The section on Carl Braaten’s letter in particular — heart-wrenchingly sad, yet necessary to say. God may yet have work for the denominations described here to do, but it will be from a very different place than even the honest critics realize.
An important analysis that takes a broad view of what’s going on. Anglicans need to stop staring at their navels and realize that there is indeed a larger reality of which we are only a part. The analysis of TEC from Pike to Schori is devastatingly accurate as it is painful. Knapsack is right, going to see the latest Batman flick will cheer you up after reading this!
Spot on, wow. A very interesting and compelling read. A++
I laughed, because it hurt too much to cry.