A.S. Haley on the Latest South Carolina TEC Legal Maneuver to Appeal Judge Houck's Decision

It is the attack made on Judge Houck’s factual reasoning in the first seven pages of the Memorandum that I would like to consider. Here the attorneys argue that under an earlier case from the same Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal which would hear any appeal from Judge Houck’s decision Bishop vonRosenberg has certain prerogatives of his office with which Bishop Lawrence is allegedly interfering.

The argument is ludicrous on its face. Consider this point: Bishop Lawrence is also a bishop of a diocese — the one that is paying his salary — and so under that same precedent, he has certain prerogatives of his office as well. What Bishop vonRosenberg wants is to restrict Bishop Lawrence’s prerogatives just so he can exercise the ones he claims are his.

And that is not all. In Dixon v. Edwards (the earlier case in question), Bishop Dixon claimed that it was the vestry and rector of a particular parish in her own diocese that were interfering with her prerogatives as its bishop, and the court decided that her claims warranted relief. But Bishop Lawrence is not in the same diocese as Bishop vonRosenberg, and is not subject to his jurisdiction. If Bishop Lawrence’s activities in his own diocese are interfering with Bishop vonRosenberg’s activities in his, then can a federal court supply a remedy? To do so would be to wade too far into matters that are “quintessentially ecclesiastical” (to quote the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Schofield case), in violation of the First Amendment.

Read it all and please note the link to the South Carolina filing which you can read in full.

More South Carolina Links

print

Posted in * Anglican - Episcopal, * Christian Life / Church Life, * Culture-Watch, * South Carolina, - Anglican: Analysis, Episcopal Church (TEC), Ethics / Moral Theology, Law & Legal Issues, Parish Ministry, Presiding Bishop, Stewardship, TEC Bishops, TEC Conflicts, TEC Conflicts: South Carolina, Theology

3 comments on “A.S. Haley on the Latest South Carolina TEC Legal Maneuver to Appeal Judge Houck's Decision

  1. Pageantmaster Ù† says:

    Well for me the money quote from Mr Haley is this right at the end:

    ..this motion, at least to this church litigator, appears to be such a monumental waste of Church funds (and note that the latest figures from ECUSA’s Treasurer show that the amounts spent on “litigation to safeguard property Church-wide” is already more than double the amount budgeted for the entire year, and is well on its way to exceeding the budget by 300%! That is why I say that all of the hand-wringing over the triennial budget is just so much Sturm und Drang. The real priorities at 815 are to spend whatever it takes in order to impoverish their opponents — the “budget” be damned)

    This entirely confirms the background to the takeover of the United Thank Offering by the TEC Presiding Bishop this Summer and my assessment that she has run out of funds:

    No wonder the Bandit Queen is trying to raid the United Thank Offering’s coffers.

    As predicted, they have run out of other peoples’ money, and used up their short-term lines of credit in financing the faux dioceses and their burgeoning litigation.

    Ho hum – Tisdale and Beers better tighten their belts and cut back on the champagne lifestyle just like ordinary people have had to

    There is quite a stink going on about the way the Presiding Kleptocrat has stolen control of the United Thank Offering and packed it with her stooges to swamp the existing ladies.

    Such is the ruthlessness of the Litigocrazy at 815 and the determination to raid all remaining funds of TEC they can lay their hands on before Goodwin Proctor’s puppet money bag’s reign comes to an end.

    Meanwhile what it that sound? Why, it is pigs in truffles. Oink oink oink all the way to the bank!

  2. Pageantmaster Ù† says:

    Meanwhile the spineless bishops of TEC are being treated to a dumbed down diet of pseudo religious tripe at their latest meeting – Sesame Street theology for Schori’s emasculated supine bishops one hears from where Spring is sprung apparently in this strange world.

    Will they say a word about the abuse of office by the PB and her band of robbers? Unlikely – they will no doubt keep taking the happy pills and ignoring the declining revenues, emptying pews, canonical abuse and the echoing empty bank accounts and continue to rubber stamp whatever monkey business the Kleptocracy put in front of them to sign off on.

    What is that sound? Why it is the sound of the wise monkeys chattering.

  3. The_Elves says:

    [i] What do you really think, Pageantmaster? [Big Smile]. [/i]