In Luke’s gospel, Jesus prays ”˜That they may be one’. The reason for this prayer is simple, ”˜that the world may believe’. The priority of unity is therefore no added extra. We should not be content to see churches and denominations proliferate. On the other hand, the goal of full visible unity in the organic sense looks mpossible, but we should at least be working towards recognising each other’s ministry and as far as possible guaranteeing an interchangeable ministry to the world.
One of the greatest seductions of our time for the church is to serve consumerism by offering Christianity up as an option in the religious market place. This eduction creeps upon us in two main ways.
Firstly, we offer the proliferation of churches, styles of worshipping and our disagreements as a conduit for evangelism. In other words we make excuses for our disunity and pretend that our division serves the gospel. Everyone can find what they want in the religious market place, we suggest. Surely this contradicts the Pentecost vision of a church of all languages, cultures, generations?
Secondly, we pretend that Christianity itself is one option among many, that other faiths serve God through differing cultures. The prevailing wisdom of our age is that no one vision of God can possibly be universal. This is the greatest lie and deceit the Church currently faces.
The universality of faith is at stake in the contemporary Anglican crisis far more than the vexed subject of homosexuality. This is partly because if the Bible has no purchase in the area of personal morality, how can it possibly be said to have any relevance to other areas? But also because the two questions are related to the lordship of Christ in each of our lives.
Our heart rightly tells us that God loves all and judges no one, because we fear that judgement, but our reading of the text tells us that these decisions are entirely out of our hands.
So if unity is a priority for evangelism, then surely evangelicals, for whom Matthew 28 has meant more than most, should recognise this dearly. Yet a false dichotomy is constantly established between truth and unity ”” as though the two are divisible. And evangelicals have stood primarily for fissiparousness and acrimony rather than going the extra mile for the sake of a Gospel which prioritises unity, and describes the church as the body of Christ.
Disunity is akin to amputation. Undoubtedly it is something which is sometimes necessary for the whole body’s health, but only to be embarked upon as the last resort.
So what do we learn about the priority of unity as far as the current dispute in the Anglican Communion is concerned? Well, it’s not over till it’s over. In other words, whether or not Gene Robinson is there or not, the Lambeth Conference is an absolute priority for Anglican Bishops if they truly want to serve unity and truth.
In his Advent letter, Dr Rowan Williams stated quite bluntly about his original invitations that refusal to meet could constitute a refusal of the cross. “I have repeatedly said that an invitation to Lambeth does not constitute a certificate of orthodoxy but simply a challenge to pray seriously together and to seek a resolution that will be as widely owned as may be…We are being asked to see our handling of conflict and potential division as part of our maturing both as pastors and as disciples.”
–This article appeared in the Church of England Newspaper, December 28 2007/January 4 2008 edition, page 14